Accountability makes Media more believable

In times of Berlusconi & Co., citizens should be enabled to understand the mechanism of the media more profoundly: Why do some news make it into the news and others don’t? If the press wants to stay independent, the media itself and its users must become proactive. Which potential for this do old and new instruments of media accountability embody?

That is what MediaAcT is about, an international research project. It examines the development and the influence of various forms of media accountability in Western and Eastern Europe as well as in two Arabic countries. For the first time, innovative instruments of media regulation (for example media blogs, online-ombudswomen) are analysed in a comparative approach.

Susanne Fengler, professor for International Journalism at the department of Journalism at the Technical University Darmstadt and CEO of the Erich-Brost-Institut for International Journalism is the head of the EU-supported project MediaAcT. The MDG-Media-blog wanted to know from her:

What gave you the idea for your project Media Accountability and Transparency in Europe (MediaAcT)?

Susanne Fengler: Traditional instruments of media accountability, such as press councils, are no longer capable of encountering the challenges of the internet. The case of a young man from the Netherlands makes this point clear: When looking for employment, an interview, which he had given three years ago, turned into an obstacle for his hirement. It was still accessible through google and the newspaper refused to take it offline. The man turned to the Dutch press council, but the experts were helpless. They did not know how to react.

Not only researches and experts face new issues due to the internet, it also puts a lot of pressure on the media. Advertisement has drifted to the internet and the editors are suffering from massive shortages. The publishers are looking for new synergies and this causes a massive concentration of media. That is why a functioning media accountability has become so crucial.

However, so far, there has been very little research on new approaches of media accountability and hardly any comparative empirical research. MediaAcT tries to close this gap.

We are comparing ways of media accountability in 13 countries in Europe and the Arabic world and have a look at where new forms of media accountability can be found and which approaches might function very well.

What has already become clear beforehand?

Fengler: We assume that the various approaches of media accountability will be quite different throughout the different journalistic cultures. The central- and northern- European countries, for example, face a long tradition of institutionalized media accountability. Thus, in Germany and the Scandinavian countries, there have been press councils for quite some time. Between 1950 and 1970, there was a remarkable wave of newly found councils, most of which have not ceased existence ever since then. The Eastern European countries have partly copied this model during the transformational process in the 1990s. Since then, Poland has created a press council, Estonia even two. On the other hand, other European countries such as Romania do not have a press council at all. Also concerning the media journalism there are quite different developments. In Great Britain, for instance, media journalism has already played a crucial role ever since Daniel Defoe. By now, a lot in this field is happening online, for example on pages such as journalism.co.uk. In this aspect, the British are the pioneers in Europe. However, the Northern African states still have a big deficit in this field. So we also want to give impulses with our project.

How could innovative forms be transferred to other cultures?

Fengler: When transferring over the borders of journalistic cultures, the internet certainly plays a crucial part. It is easier to try out new ideas on the web than founding new institutions such as the press council. That is why we are hoping to be able to get in touch with bloggers and make the blogg-sphere interested in media accountability. The BILD-blog gives an example of how well this can function.

Responsible and pluralistic media are a key to democracies – and also for reaching the UN-Millennium Goals. What is media accountability able to bring about in times of media concentration?

Fengler: In times of Berlusconi & Co., we must enable citizens to understand the mechanism of the media: Why do some news make it on the media and others don’t? This is especially important in countries such as Romania and other Eastern European states, where the media is in the hands of very few and partly foreign corporate groups. The press councils in Germany and Great Britain, for example, have been founded in order to prevent interventions from the State. If the press wants to stay independent, the media itself and its users must become proactive.

How are you planning on gaining your stakeholders’ attention?

Fengler: We want to create awareness for media accountability among those who are politically responsible, among the media managers, among the readers and obviously among the journalists. The creators of media and the managers must realize that they can get closer to their readers via ombudsmen and that, on the long run, this will help them also economically.

In Germany, quality media like the magazine Der Spiegel are investing heavily in counter-research and documentation. That is what makes them believable. Furthermore, we want to develop recommendations for EU law-makers and provide blueprints for everybody who is in charge. For example, we are considering a handbook with examples of successful approaches.

How did the politically responsible react to your project?

Fengler: We get the impression that the awareness for media accountability is rising among those in charge. For our advisory board, we could gain, among others, the former OSZE media commissioner Prof. Dr. Miklos Haraszti. So far we have received very positive reactions to our project. MediaAcT is the only project related to media and coordinated by a German institution, which is being supported in the seventh research program of the European Union.

How do you estimate the potentials of media accountability?

Fengler: Media accountability is a key indicator for a pluralistic media system and has an enormous potential, which so far has hardly been exploited. Especially the internet with its various possibilities of participation offers a lot of space for innovations.

Susanne Fengler, PhD, is the director of the Erich Brost Institute and professor for international journalism at the Institute of Journalism, TU Dortmund University. She coordinates the EU project “Media Accountability and Transparency in Europe“ (MediaAcT).

Previously she has worked as a researcher and lecturer at Freie Universität, Berlin, at the universities of Zurich, Basel, Lucerne, and Fribourg (Switzerland), for the Swiss school for journalism MAZ and for the International Institute of Journalism (IIJ). Her professional experiences include journalism and political communication. Media accountability is one of her main research interests. Other topics are comparative journalism studies, political journalism, development communication, and the economic theory of journalism. She has published numerous national and international books and articles and edits the new book series “Kompaktwissen Journalismus”. In cooperation with Stephan Russ-Mohl, she has published a book and several national and international articles about the application of economic theory to journalism research.

Asia´s Media Innovators

Janala means “window” in Bangla. Janala offers hundreds of three-minute audio lessons and quizzes – delivered via text message (SMS) – for about 7 cents American per lesson. People in Bangladesh get access to a range of capacity-programmes via their mobile phone. The Australian Professor and Journalist Stephen Quinn has just finished a new study on innovations in Asia´s Media. The MDG-Media-Blog interviewed him on the most important foundings.

weiterlesen…

Door Opener eGovernment: Small Solutions with Great Potential

Simply the access to information – which is so natural in the developed world –  already has an immediate positive impact on development. So it is not always about huge engineering projects. It is often the small solutions originating from local problems which are better accepted. In Kenya, for instance, an electronic system was installed, with which cases of corruption could be reported anonymously. It was a novelty in the region and it was implemented with a minimum cost. Concrete contributions in terms of development policy are already in sight in telemedicine and eLearning – says Professor Dr. Tino Schuppan, Scientific Director of the Institute for eGovernment, an integrated body of the Potsdam University. In the interview for the MDG-Media-Blog Karla Sponar wanted to know from him: weiterlesen…

Mobile Reporting: New Perspectives for the Dark Continent

Africa — a continent of backwardness, wars, crises and catastrophes. This picture is firmly anchored in many people’s heads. But the Dark Continent has more to offer. For example in the area of the media: on account of the much-cited digital revolution, the relationship between traditional and new media is changing, even in Africa.

Where the discussion of media developments on the African continent is concerned, the term “mobile revolution” has become a catchphrase. The term alludes to the rapid spread of mobile phone technology. And it doesn’t only apply to the mostly more advanced north of the continent but also, and above all, to the majority of Africa’s Sub-Saharan states. An article published by the Konrad Adenauer Foundation tells us that almost 70% of the telecommunications net of Sub-Saharan Africa is controlled by mobile phone operators. weiterlesen…

Venezuela a la sombra de la autocensura

Entre mayo de 2002 y mayo de 2009, el sistema de alertas del Instituto Prensa y Sociedad de Venezuela (Ipys Venezuela) registró 464 episodios de ataques contra medios y periodistas o de limitaciones contra la libertad de prensa. Esto representa un promedio de siete incidentes por mes durante ese período de siete años. weiterlesen…

Journalism between hope and trembling: the example of the Philippines

Raymund Villanueva still remembers July 2 2006 with horror.  In the early morning that Sunday, the little broadcasting center of the community radio station „Radyo Cagayano“, which he helped building up, was being burned down completely. At about two in the morning, eight mummed soldiers infiltrated the premises in the small town of Baggao in the Northern Philippines, captivated and gagged the employees and ignited the entire radio station with petrol. Radyo Cagayano had just started broadcasting a few weeks ago and had especially stood up for the interests of local farmers. Until today, Radyo Cagayano has been unable to pick up his work again due to a murder on one of his employees and heavy reprisal. Raymund Villanueva supports the broadcasting station with technical equipment and know-how, after his own radio station has been prohibited by the government on the day of the emergency act of February 24 2006. weiterlesen…

The Commodification of News – African Experiences

Most African governments and key players in the field of development cooperation are now repeatedly arguing that Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) will not be met by 2015. They cite lack of financial resources and hostile economic environments as the most visible hurdles. Many of them hardly address the lack of political will and misuse of existing resources as areas in need of urgent attention. Empirical evidence available on performance indicators for MDGs shows that it is too early for governments in developing countries to give up meeting targets as we have just gone past the midpoint. weiterlesen…

Presse.Freiheit.Entwickeln

Panel discussion on Thursday, 1st October at 6pm.
Deutsche Welle, Kurt-Schumacher-Str. 3,53113 Bonn

A discussion will take place about how journalists, particularly those working on the African continent, are able to fulfill their roles. Taking part in this discussion are:

Ludger Schadomsky, Deutsche Welle / Holger Ehling, Reporter ohne Grenzen / Renate Schröder, Europäische Journalisten Föderation / Moderation: Monika Hoegen / Keynote: Thomas Deve, Journalist Simbabwe, UN-Millenniumkampagne weiterlesen…

Insufficient Press Freedom in South Eastern Europe

Over the last few years, the states of South East Europe (SEE) have developed in very different ways: Bulgaria and Romania are members of the EU – but were chastised by the EU in 2008, because areas like security, rule of law and the combating of corruption had been slow in developing. Croatia has a good chance of joining the Union in the near future – despite the unrest of this year. The same applies to Montenegro and Macedonia. In contrast the situation in Bosnia-Herzegovina is very unstable under the surface. In Serbia two roughly similarly large blocs of the population are fighting for the future course of the country: closer contacts with the EU or confrontation with the West with the support of Russia. The declaration of independence in Kosovo has hardened the fronts once more. In addition the new republic is also showing itself to be a highly fragile entity internally as well because of the continuing conflicts between ethnic Albanians and various different minorities (Serbs, Roma, among others). Albania itself – involved in the conflicts of the region because of the ethnic Albanian populations in Kosovo und Macedonia – is still being held back in its development because of poverty, corruption and organized crime. weiterlesen…

Retos de los medios ante la corrupción en América Latina

La relación entre periodismo y corrupción tiene mucho sentido en América Latina porque, para decirlo a secas, es una región muy corrupta. Transparency Internacional sigue considerándola la más corrupta después de África. Como es bastante conocido, la clase política ha tenido un desempeño lamentable para enfrentar el problema, y tal vez no sea exagerado decir que es parte del problema. Si uno hace una lista de las dos últimas generaciones de presidentes latinoamericanos implicados directa o indirectamente con la corrupción de su gobierno, obtiene rápidamente un número de dos cifras. A veces, en algunos países, el desencanto con los políticos antiguos lleva a las masas a apoyar nuevas figuras que, con un discurso antisistema, obtienen el gobierno y una vez allí remozan la corrupción. Tenemos el caso de Perú, en la década pasada. Y ahora el ejemplo más conspicuo es el de Venezuela. weiterlesen…

weiter umsehen »